D.2 Domestic public funding on conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity and ecosystems.
Note: Monetary value of domestic public expenditure on biodiversity per year in national currency.
2024-03-28 12:00:00 UTC
Headline Indicator for Goal D Adequate means of implementation, including financial resources, capacity-building, technical and scientific cooperation, and access to and transfer of technology to fully implement the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework are secured and equitably accessible to all Parties, especially developing country Parties, in particular the least developed countries and small island developing States, as well as countries with economies in transition, progressively closing the biodiversity finance gap of $700 billion per year, and aligning financial flows with the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework and the 2050 Vision for biodiversity.
Headline indicator forTarget 19 Substantially and progressively increase the level of financial resources from all sources, in an effective, timely and easily accessible manner, including domestic, international, public and private resources, in accordance with Article 20 of the Convention, to implement national biodiversity strategies and action plans, mobilizing at least $200 billion per year by 2030, including by:
(a) Increasing total biodiversity related international financial resources from developed countries, including official development assistance, and from countries that voluntarily assume obligations of developed country Parties, to developing countries, in particular the least developed countries and small island developing States, as well as countries with economies in transition, to at least $20 billion per year by 2025, and to at least $30 billion per year by 2030;
(b) Significantly increasing domestic resource mobilization, facilitated by the preparation and implementation of national biodiversity finance plans or similar instruments according to national needs, priorities and circumstances;
(c) Leveraging private finance, promoting blended finance, implementing strategies for raising new and additional resources, and encouraging the private sector to invest in biodiversity, including through impact funds and other instruments;
(d) Stimulating innovative schemes such as payment for ecosystem services, green bonds, biodiversity offsets and credits, and benefit sharing mechanisms, with environmental and social safeguards;
(e) Optimizing co-benefits and synergies of finance targeting the biodiversity and climate crises;
(f) Enhancing the role of collective actions, including by indigenous peoples and local communities, Mother Earth centric actions and non-market-based approaches including community based natural resource management and civil society cooperation and solidarity aimed at the conservation of biodiversity;
(g) Enhancing the effectiveness, efficiency and transparency of resource provision and use.
Draft Goal D relates to the means of implementation for the post-2020 global biodiversity framework. The post-2020 global biodiversity framework will need to be implemented primarily through activities at the national and/or subnational levels, with supporting and/or enabling action at the regional and global levels. However, the capacity for implementing the Convention in terms of human, technical and financial resources is limited in most countries, especially in developing countries, in particular the least developed countries and small island developing States, as well as countries with economies in transition. Reaching the 2050 Vision for biodiversity will require that the necessary means of implementation are available to enable Parties and stakeholders to undertake the necessary actions.
Target 19 refers to an increase of resources for biodiversity from all sources, including international, national, public and private. Target 19 (b) refers to domestic funding aiming at monitoring over time the trend in mobilizing resources for the implementation of the GBF. Inadequate funding levels are a major impediment to effective biodiversity conservation in many countries and may be associated with failures to meet global targets. Conservation investment has been demonstrated to reduce biodiversity loss. Spending on biodiversity provides a very high social return on investment. Thus, while increased biodiversity resource mobilization from all sources is not only necessary to reduce, halt and reverse biodiversity loss (i.e.to bend the curve on biodiversity loss) it is also likely to generate net economic benefits for both present and future generations.Current global biodiversity finance is of the order of $100 billion per year, while estimates of funding needs for a comprehensive post 2020 global biodiversity framework are of the order of $800 billion per year, giving a funding gap of the order of $700 billion per year. This indicator will provide information on domestic resource mobilization at the national level based on a bottom-up approach, useful for global and regional assessments.
The rationale for domestic public expenditure on biodiversity conservation is firmly grounded in the fundamental importance of this tool for preserving nature and ensuring the health and functionality of ecosystems. Currently, domestic public expenditure represents the predominant share of global financial resources allocated to the protection of biodiversity. This financial commitment reflects a national dedication to maintaining ecological balance, fostering resilience in ecosystems, and promoting the responsible use of natural resources within the country's borders. Moreover, it constitutes a tangible contribution to achieving international conservation goals and emphasizes a commitment to environmental stewardship for the well-being of both present and future generations.
The following definitions can be used to identify biodiversity expenditures:
UNDP’s Biodiversity Finance Initiative (BIOFIN) defines biodiversity national expenditures: A “biodiversity expenditure” is any expenditure whose purpose is to have a positive impact or to reduce or eliminate pressures on biodiversity. These biodiversity public expenditures include “direct” expenditures that have biodiversity as their principal purpose, or ‘causa finalis’, as well as “indirect” expenditures that have biodiversity as their secondary or joint purpose.
In terms of the categories, BIOFIN uses nine categories for recording primary and secondary expenditures: (1) Biodiversity awareness and knowledge, (2) Green economy, (3) Pollution management, (4) Sustainable use, (5) Biosafety, (6) Protected areas and OECM, (7) Restoration, (8) Access and benefit sharing, and (9) Biodiversity and development planning and finance.
The Classification of Environmental Purposes (CEP1) is an international statistics standard. It was adopted by the UN Statistical Commission in March 2024 and replaces the Classification of Environmental Protection Activities (CEPA; UN, 2000). It will be used for SEEA accounts, i.e., classifying activities, products, expenditure and other transactions related to environmental protection and management of natural resource (e.g. environmental protection and expenditure accounts [EPEA]). The most relevant “Division” (first level of disaggregation) for biodiversity is Division 05 Soil, surface and groundwater, biodiversity and forest. This covers activities, expenditures and products aimed at protection and remediation of soil and water, biodiversity and forests.
Division 05 is disaggregated into the following “groups” (level 2): 501 Protection of soil, surface and groundwater, 502 Protection of biodiversity and landscape, 503 Management of forest resources. The Group 502 Protection of biodiversity and landscapes covers activities, expenditures and products aimed at protecting and replenishment of wild fauna and flora, safeguarding and restoring their habitats, ecosystems of which they are part, natural or semi-natural terrestrial, marine and other aquatic ecosystems. Such activities, measures and products are included regardless of the type of areas involved (terrestrial, freshwater incl. wetlands, and marine areas) and whether they occur in areas which are classified as protected areas. Groups are further disaggregated into classes (level 3).
For further detail on the definitions of the other categories, see the CEP document.
The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) COFOG was developed in 1999 by the OECD and published by the UN Statistical Division as an international statistical standard for classifying the purposes (functions) of government activities. It classifies government expenditure data from the System of National Accounts by the purpose for which the funds are used. The first-level COFOG splits expenditure data into ten “functional” groups or sub-sectors of expenditures, and second-level COFOG further splits each first-level group into up to nine sub-groups. Group 5.4: “Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape” covers activities relating to the protection of fauna and flora species (including the reintroduction of extinct species and the recovery of species menaced by extinction), the protection of habitats (including the management of natural parks and reserves) and the protection of landscapes for their aesthetic values (including the rehabilitation of damaged landscapes to improve their aesthetic value). COFOG data can be used in the development of EPEA.
Note: international funding should not be accounted under D.2, even ODA that flows through national budgets.
Countries will report the monetary value of domestic public expenditure in national currency per year during the CBD national reporting cycle.
Data should come directly from countries. Countries should include in their report what the reported expenditure includes, and which methodology and/or statistical framework has been used.
Developing country Parties should exclude from the reporting on domestic expenditures for biodiversity those flows that were supported by developed country Parties, or other providers of international public finance, such as multilateral institutions, or international private finance, such as private philanthropy (these flows are captured through the D.1 and D.3 indicators, respectively).
The reporting template will provide a dropdown menu for countries to select which data source and/or methodology was used to report for this headline indicator, including but not limited to the following:
BIOFIN: UNDP’s Biodiversity Finance Initiative (BIOFIN) developed a methodology providing guidance to estimate national expenditures for biodiversity; these included public, NGOs and donors. For the purpose of reporting on D2, countries will only report on public funding. The methodology focuses on recording primary and secondary expenditures in nine categories; for the latter, BIOFIN uses attribution rates to account for positive impact on biodiversity. These categories: (1) Biodiversity awareness and knowledge, (2) Green economy, (3) Pollution management, (4) Sustainable use, (4) Biosafety, (5) Protected areas and OECM, (6) Restoration, (7) Access and benefit sharing, and (9) Biodiversity and development planning and finance. It is highly recommended to report on expenditures and not planned budget.
CEP: The Classification of Environmental Purposes (CEP) will be used for SEEA accounts, i.e. classifying activities, products, expenditure and other transactions related to environmental protection and management of natural resource. The most relevant division is: 5 Soil, surface and groundwater, biodiversity and forest which encompasses 501 Protection of soil, surface and groundwater, 502 Protection of biodiversity and landscape, 503 Management of forest resources. A share of expenditure classified in other divisions may also be considered biodiversity relevant. Countries should indicate in their reporting which divisions/groups they have included and what, if any, coefficient they have applied (i.e. what share of expenditure they have counted as biodiversity expenditure).
Please note that CEP is an international statistical classification system which is replacing CEPA. The 27 EU countries are required to develop and report data from environmental protection and expenditure accounts (EPEA). The EPEA have been classified according to the CEPA and from 2025 should be classified according to the new CEP. The CEP is the first statistical classification of activities or products that allows mapping to “policy areas” such as for biodiversity (as well climate change mitigation, circular economy, etc.). It therefore allows for SEEA-based applications for those policy areas (see the Annex of the CEP for further detail). The CEP can also be used, for example, in biodiversity budget tagging.
COFOG: Under COFOG, governments code each purchase, wage payment, transfer, loan disbursement or other outlay under one of ten divisions, according to the primary function or purpose that the transaction serves. Each of these divisions is then broken down into groups, which, in turn, are subdivided into classes. Expenditure for which environmental protection is the primary purpose (irrespective of the sector) are coded under Division 5, Environment Protection. Activities relating to the protection of fauna and flora species (including the reintroduction of extinct species and the recovery of species menaced by extinction), the protection of habitats (including the management of natural parks and reserves) and the protection of landscapes for their aesthetic values (including the rehabilitation of damaged landscapes to improve their aesthetic value) are coded under Group 5.4: Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape. COFOG does not capture sustainable use activities.
Data will be reported directly from countries through the CBD Secretariat through the national reporting cycles.
UNDP-BIOFIN:
CEP:
COFOG (COFOG is both a classification system and a database)
Primarily derived from government records (national budgets and accounts) on public expenditures, and when available regional/multilateral databases e.g., Eurostat.
Reporting will follow CBD’s national reporting cycle.
The baseline for countries to report 2020 onwards, and should follow the CBD national reporting timeline.
Countries through national reports to the CBD, Statistical offices or Ministries of Finance preferably or Ministers of Environment.
CBD Secretariat through country national reporting.
EUROSTAT, OECD and IMF for COFOG
EUROSTAT and OECD for EPEA
UNDP-BIOFIN (Compiles data but does not have a database)
Each of the methodologies or systems of classification available have gaps and challenges, mainly:
None of these are applied by all CBD Parties, they differ in relation to what each methodology or framework considers as biodiversity expenditures.
COFOG: Based on primary purposes, covering “biodiversity and landscape protection”. It does not capture sustainable use activities. It is an international statistical classification system. While COFOG has global coverage, not all countries disaggregate data on expenditure on environment protection. Data on biodiversity and landscape protection are available for 59 countries (2020).
EPEA: Not all countries have developed an EPEA according to the SEEA framework. The 27 EU countries are required to develop an EPEA and these statistics are compiled by Eurostat. EPEA from OECD countries are compiled by the OECD. The EPEA have been classified according to the CEPA and from 2025 should be classified according to the new CEP. The CEP is the first statistical classification of activities or products that allows mapping to “policy areas” including for biodiversity, climate change mitigation and circular economy, etc. It therefore allows for SEEA-based applications for those policy areas (see the Annex of the CEP for further detail). CEP is based on primary purposes, covering biodiversity protection and resource management.
BIOFIN: Based on primary and secondary purposes, covering a wide range of activities related to the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity. It has been used by 41 countries.
Scale of application:National
Scale of data disaggregation/aggregation:
Global/ regional scale indicator can be disaggregated to national level: No
National data is collated to form global indicator: No
No
Target 18.1 Positive incentives in place to promote biodiversity conservation and sustainable use.
Target 19.
Goal D.1International public funding, including official development assistance (ODA) for conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity and ecosystems
N/A
D.2 Domestic public funding on conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity and ecosystems.
Note: Monetary value of domestic public expenditure on biodiversity per year in national currency.
2024-03-28 12:00:00 UTC
Headline Indicator for Goal D Adequate means of implementation, including financial resources, capacity-building, technical and scientific cooperation, and access to and transfer of technology to fully implement the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework are secured and equitably accessible to all Parties, especially developing country Parties, in particular the least developed countries and small island developing States, as well as countries with economies in transition, progressively closing the biodiversity finance gap of $700 billion per year, and aligning financial flows with the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework and the 2050 Vision for biodiversity.
Headline indicator forTarget 19 Substantially and progressively increase the level of financial resources from all sources, in an effective, timely and easily accessible manner, including domestic, international, public and private resources, in accordance with Article 20 of the Convention, to implement national biodiversity strategies and action plans, mobilizing at least $200 billion per year by 2030, including by:
(a) Increasing total biodiversity related international financial resources from developed countries, including official development assistance, and from countries that voluntarily assume obligations of developed country Parties, to developing countries, in particular the least developed countries and small island developing States, as well as countries with economies in transition, to at least $20 billion per year by 2025, and to at least $30 billion per year by 2030;
(b) Significantly increasing domestic resource mobilization, facilitated by the preparation and implementation of national biodiversity finance plans or similar instruments according to national needs, priorities and circumstances;
(c) Leveraging private finance, promoting blended finance, implementing strategies for raising new and additional resources, and encouraging the private sector to invest in biodiversity, including through impact funds and other instruments;
(d) Stimulating innovative schemes such as payment for ecosystem services, green bonds, biodiversity offsets and credits, and benefit sharing mechanisms, with environmental and social safeguards;
(e) Optimizing co-benefits and synergies of finance targeting the biodiversity and climate crises;
(f) Enhancing the role of collective actions, including by indigenous peoples and local communities, Mother Earth centric actions and non-market-based approaches including community based natural resource management and civil society cooperation and solidarity aimed at the conservation of biodiversity;
(g) Enhancing the effectiveness, efficiency and transparency of resource provision and use.
Draft Goal D relates to the means of implementation for the post-2020 global biodiversity framework. The post-2020 global biodiversity framework will need to be implemented primarily through activities at the national and/or subnational levels, with supporting and/or enabling action at the regional and global levels. However, the capacity for implementing the Convention in terms of human, technical and financial resources is limited in most countries, especially in developing countries, in particular the least developed countries and small island developing States, as well as countries with economies in transition. Reaching the 2050 Vision for biodiversity will require that the necessary means of implementation are available to enable Parties and stakeholders to undertake the necessary actions.
Target 19 refers to an increase of resources for biodiversity from all sources, including international, national, public and private. Target 19 (b) refers to domestic funding aiming at monitoring over time the trend in mobilizing resources for the implementation of the GBF. Inadequate funding levels are a major impediment to effective biodiversity conservation in many countries and may be associated with failures to meet global targets. Conservation investment has been demonstrated to reduce biodiversity loss. Spending on biodiversity provides a very high social return on investment. Thus, while increased biodiversity resource mobilization from all sources is not only necessary to reduce, halt and reverse biodiversity loss (i.e.to bend the curve on biodiversity loss) it is also likely to generate net economic benefits for both present and future generations.Current global biodiversity finance is of the order of $100 billion per year, while estimates of funding needs for a comprehensive post 2020 global biodiversity framework are of the order of $800 billion per year, giving a funding gap of the order of $700 billion per year. This indicator will provide information on domestic resource mobilization at the national level based on a bottom-up approach, useful for global and regional assessments.
The rationale for domestic public expenditure on biodiversity conservation is firmly grounded in the fundamental importance of this tool for preserving nature and ensuring the health and functionality of ecosystems. Currently, domestic public expenditure represents the predominant share of global financial resources allocated to the protection of biodiversity. This financial commitment reflects a national dedication to maintaining ecological balance, fostering resilience in ecosystems, and promoting the responsible use of natural resources within the country's borders. Moreover, it constitutes a tangible contribution to achieving international conservation goals and emphasizes a commitment to environmental stewardship for the well-being of both present and future generations.
The following definitions can be used to identify biodiversity expenditures:
UNDP’s Biodiversity Finance Initiative (BIOFIN) defines biodiversity national expenditures: A “biodiversity expenditure” is any expenditure whose purpose is to have a positive impact or to reduce or eliminate pressures on biodiversity. These biodiversity public expenditures include “direct” expenditures that have biodiversity as their principal purpose, or ‘causa finalis’, as well as “indirect” expenditures that have biodiversity as their secondary or joint purpose.
In terms of the categories, BIOFIN uses nine categories for recording primary and secondary expenditures: (1) Biodiversity awareness and knowledge, (2) Green economy, (3) Pollution management, (4) Sustainable use, (5) Biosafety, (6) Protected areas and OECM, (7) Restoration, (8) Access and benefit sharing, and (9) Biodiversity and development planning and finance.
The Classification of Environmental Purposes (CEP1) is an international statistics standard. It was adopted by the UN Statistical Commission in March 2024 and replaces the Classification of Environmental Protection Activities (CEPA; UN, 2000). It will be used for SEEA accounts, i.e., classifying activities, products, expenditure and other transactions related to environmental protection and management of natural resource (e.g. environmental protection and expenditure accounts [EPEA]). The most relevant “Division” (first level of disaggregation) for biodiversity is Division 05 Soil, surface and groundwater, biodiversity and forest. This covers activities, expenditures and products aimed at protection and remediation of soil and water, biodiversity and forests.
Division 05 is disaggregated into the following “groups” (level 2): 501 Protection of soil, surface and groundwater, 502 Protection of biodiversity and landscape, 503 Management of forest resources. The Group 502 Protection of biodiversity and landscapes covers activities, expenditures and products aimed at protecting and replenishment of wild fauna and flora, safeguarding and restoring their habitats, ecosystems of which they are part, natural or semi-natural terrestrial, marine and other aquatic ecosystems. Such activities, measures and products are included regardless of the type of areas involved (terrestrial, freshwater incl. wetlands, and marine areas) and whether they occur in areas which are classified as protected areas. Groups are further disaggregated into classes (level 3).
For further detail on the definitions of the other categories, see the CEP document.
The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) COFOG was developed in 1999 by the OECD and published by the UN Statistical Division as an international statistical standard for classifying the purposes (functions) of government activities. It classifies government expenditure data from the System of National Accounts by the purpose for which the funds are used. The first-level COFOG splits expenditure data into ten “functional” groups or sub-sectors of expenditures, and second-level COFOG further splits each first-level group into up to nine sub-groups. Group 5.4: “Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape” covers activities relating to the protection of fauna and flora species (including the reintroduction of extinct species and the recovery of species menaced by extinction), the protection of habitats (including the management of natural parks and reserves) and the protection of landscapes for their aesthetic values (including the rehabilitation of damaged landscapes to improve their aesthetic value). COFOG data can be used in the development of EPEA.
Note: international funding should not be accounted under D.2, even ODA that flows through national budgets.
Countries will report the monetary value of domestic public expenditure in national currency per year during the CBD national reporting cycle.
Data should come directly from countries. Countries should include in their report what the reported expenditure includes, and which methodology and/or statistical framework has been used.
Developing country Parties should exclude from the reporting on domestic expenditures for biodiversity those flows that were supported by developed country Parties, or other providers of international public finance, such as multilateral institutions, or international private finance, such as private philanthropy (these flows are captured through the D.1 and D.3 indicators, respectively).
The reporting template will provide a dropdown menu for countries to select which data source and/or methodology was used to report for this headline indicator, including but not limited to the following:
BIOFIN: UNDP’s Biodiversity Finance Initiative (BIOFIN) developed a methodology providing guidance to estimate national expenditures for biodiversity; these included public, NGOs and donors. For the purpose of reporting on D2, countries will only report on public funding. The methodology focuses on recording primary and secondary expenditures in nine categories; for the latter, BIOFIN uses attribution rates to account for positive impact on biodiversity. These categories: (1) Biodiversity awareness and knowledge, (2) Green economy, (3) Pollution management, (4) Sustainable use, (4) Biosafety, (5) Protected areas and OECM, (6) Restoration, (7) Access and benefit sharing, and (9) Biodiversity and development planning and finance. It is highly recommended to report on expenditures and not planned budget.
CEP: The Classification of Environmental Purposes (CEP) will be used for SEEA accounts, i.e. classifying activities, products, expenditure and other transactions related to environmental protection and management of natural resource. The most relevant division is: 5 Soil, surface and groundwater, biodiversity and forest which encompasses 501 Protection of soil, surface and groundwater, 502 Protection of biodiversity and landscape, 503 Management of forest resources. A share of expenditure classified in other divisions may also be considered biodiversity relevant. Countries should indicate in their reporting which divisions/groups they have included and what, if any, coefficient they have applied (i.e. what share of expenditure they have counted as biodiversity expenditure).
Please note that CEP is an international statistical classification system which is replacing CEPA. The 27 EU countries are required to develop and report data from environmental protection and expenditure accounts (EPEA). The EPEA have been classified according to the CEPA and from 2025 should be classified according to the new CEP. The CEP is the first statistical classification of activities or products that allows mapping to “policy areas” such as for biodiversity (as well climate change mitigation, circular economy, etc.). It therefore allows for SEEA-based applications for those policy areas (see the Annex of the CEP for further detail). The CEP can also be used, for example, in biodiversity budget tagging.
COFOG: Under COFOG, governments code each purchase, wage payment, transfer, loan disbursement or other outlay under one of ten divisions, according to the primary function or purpose that the transaction serves. Each of these divisions is then broken down into groups, which, in turn, are subdivided into classes. Expenditure for which environmental protection is the primary purpose (irrespective of the sector) are coded under Division 5, Environment Protection. Activities relating to the protection of fauna and flora species (including the reintroduction of extinct species and the recovery of species menaced by extinction), the protection of habitats (including the management of natural parks and reserves) and the protection of landscapes for their aesthetic values (including the rehabilitation of damaged landscapes to improve their aesthetic value) are coded under Group 5.4: Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape. COFOG does not capture sustainable use activities.
Data will be reported directly from countries through the CBD Secretariat through the national reporting cycles.
UNDP-BIOFIN:
CEP:
COFOG (COFOG is both a classification system and a database)
Primarily derived from government records (national budgets and accounts) on public expenditures, and when available regional/multilateral databases e.g., Eurostat.
Reporting will follow CBD’s national reporting cycle.
The baseline for countries to report 2020 onwards, and should follow the CBD national reporting timeline.
Countries through national reports to the CBD, Statistical offices or Ministries of Finance preferably or Ministers of Environment.
CBD Secretariat through country national reporting.
EUROSTAT, OECD and IMF for COFOG
EUROSTAT and OECD for EPEA
UNDP-BIOFIN (Compiles data but does not have a database)
Each of the methodologies or systems of classification available have gaps and challenges, mainly:
None of these are applied by all CBD Parties, they differ in relation to what each methodology or framework considers as biodiversity expenditures.
COFOG: Based on primary purposes, covering “biodiversity and landscape protection”. It does not capture sustainable use activities. It is an international statistical classification system. While COFOG has global coverage, not all countries disaggregate data on expenditure on environment protection. Data on biodiversity and landscape protection are available for 59 countries (2020).
EPEA: Not all countries have developed an EPEA according to the SEEA framework. The 27 EU countries are required to develop an EPEA and these statistics are compiled by Eurostat. EPEA from OECD countries are compiled by the OECD. The EPEA have been classified according to the CEPA and from 2025 should be classified according to the new CEP. The CEP is the first statistical classification of activities or products that allows mapping to “policy areas” including for biodiversity, climate change mitigation and circular economy, etc. It therefore allows for SEEA-based applications for those policy areas (see the Annex of the CEP for further detail). CEP is based on primary purposes, covering biodiversity protection and resource management.
BIOFIN: Based on primary and secondary purposes, covering a wide range of activities related to the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity. It has been used by 41 countries.
Scale of application:National
Scale of data disaggregation/aggregation:
Global/ regional scale indicator can be disaggregated to national level: No
National data is collated to form global indicator: No
No
Target 18.1 Positive incentives in place to promote biodiversity conservation and sustainable use.
Target 19.
Goal D.1International public funding, including official development assistance (ODA) for conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity and ecosystems
N/A
Feedback: UNEP-WCMC is keen to ensure that our data is accurate and up to date. We welcome any feedback on the quality, reliability, and accuracy of the information on this site. If you see any errors or missing information, please get in touch.